Preventing Nightmares: Preserving Issues and Avoiding Waiver at Trial

Why Attend?

• Review the necessary techniques to preserve issues for appeal.
• Understand some of the hidden waiver traps and how to avoid them.
• Explore examples drawn from the most recent cases with two experienced appellate lawyers.

Trial Techniques That Lead to Successful Appeals

Often lawyers take on an appeal believing they have a solid argument for reversal, only to learn that their promising issue has been waived by a failure to preserve it in the trial court. In this program, two experienced appellate lawyers explain some of the ways to avoid having to answer troubling waiver questions at the appellate lectern. The program focuses on hidden waiver traps and on the contemporaneous objection rule, recognizing the fact that preservation is not an appellate skill: it is a trial-court skill.

This seminar returns with all NEW “nightmares.” It will explore the basic rules associated with issue preservation and focus specifically on the many traps for the unwary lawyer. Our speakers will also examine the most recent rulings of the Supreme Court of Virginia and Court of Appeals of Virginia as they affect trial practice and appellate preservation, including:

• Amazon Logistics, Inc. v. Virginia Employment Commission: Insufficient briefing, approbate/reprobate doctrine
• Commonwealth v. Carolino: Failed to assign error to all bases of ruling
• Sidar v. Doe: Untimely Rule 1:1A filing because clerk would not accept filing
• Cappe v. Commonwealth: Cannot merely “cut and paste” in assignments of error presented to the SCV after losing in the CAV
• Harris v. Howard: error for an appellate court to reverse for a reason not argued in the trial court
• Doe v. Green: An appellant may not cite new authority in support of an argument if it is actually a new argument that wasn’t presented to the trial court
• Harwood v. Chinchilla: Voluntary payments made prelitigation may not be recovered from the payee even if the purported payment obligation is later determined by the court to be void or unenforceable
• Pollack v. Virginia State Bar: Insufficient briefing will doom an appeal; arguments presented for the first time on appeal are waived

Registration Deadlines:

Cancellation Policy: Cancellation/transfer requests will be honored until 5:00 p.m. the day preceding the seminar. You will, however, be charged $40 if you cancel or transfer your registration to a different seminar after the link to the materials has been e-mailed by Virginia CLE^®.

Full refunds or transfers are available up to two days after a webcast in the unlikely event that you experience technical difficulties.

Dietary Restrictions: If you have dietary restrictions and are attending the seminar in person, please email deanna.mcglothlin@vacle.org.

Inclement Weather Policy and Updates

MCLE Credit Caveat: The MCLE Board measures credits by the time you spend in attendance. If you enter a seminar late or leave it early, or both, you must reflect those adjustments accurately in the credits you report on your credit reporting form. A code will be given at the end of the seminar, which must be written on your MCLE form.

Private recording of this program is prohibited.

Can’t Attend?

E-mail distance_ed@vacle.org to be notified when/if this program is made available as an online or USB seminar.
E-mail publications@vacle.org to be notified when/if this program’s seminar materials are made available for sale.

Course Schedule

• Q&A will be handled via chat room for Webcast attendees.
• Q&A will be handled via e-mail for telephone seminar attendees.

Faculty

Kevin E. Martingayle, Bischoff Martingayle, PC / Virginia Beach

Juli M. Porto, Blankingship & Keith, PC / Fairfax

About the Speakers

Kevin E. Martingayle, Bischoff Martingayle, PC / Virginia Beach

Kevin E. Martingayle is a co-founder of Bischoff Martingayle, PC, and served as the 2014-15 president of the Virginia State Bar. He has served on the VSB Council, Executive Committee, Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Board, Standing Committee on Legal Ethics, Professionalism Faculty for new lawyers and law students, Special Committee on the Future of Law Practice, Education of Lawyers Section Board of Governors, American Bar Association Standing Committee on Professionalism, Virginia Trial Lawyers Association Ethics and Professionalism Committee, and the Lawyers Helping Lawyers Board of Directors. He is also a past chair of the VTLA’s Appellate Practice Section. Mr. Martingayle is a graduate of Hampden-Sydney College with a degree in Economics (Cum Laude, Phi Beta Kappa) and the University of Virginia School of Law.

Juli M. Porto, Blankingship & Keith, PC / Fairfax

Juli M. Porto is a partner at Blankingship & Keith, PC, and handles cases at both the trial and appellate levels. At the appellate level, she handles a wide range of civil matters. In addition to bringing and defending appeals, she consults with trial attorneys to develop legal theories of recovery and draft complaints, brief and argue dispositive and post-trial motions, and monitor trials as embedded appellate counsel. At the trial level, she devotes her practice to personal injury matters with complex liability issues. Ms. Porto is a member of the Virginia Bar Association’s Appellate Section Council and the Virginia Trial Lawyers Association’s Amicus Committee. She graduated as an Honors Scholar from New York University with a degree in Economics and earned her law degree from George Mason University School of Law. You can follow her blog, which focuses on civil matters in the Court of Appeals, at virginiaappeals.org.